Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4062 (PNJ)

SUKHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/7359/2026 · 2026-05-05

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 205 Sukhbir Singh and others State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 petitioners in case Sections 109, 125, 191(2), 190 of the Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Lopoke, District Amritsar Rural. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated have joined investigation and for investigation of the case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petition required for the purpose of investigation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is interim order dated 6. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 05.05.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-7359 Date of decision: Sukhbir Singh and others VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Raghav Soni, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the in case bearing FIR No.149 dated 109, 125, 191(2), 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Lopoke, District Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 09.02.2026 passed by this Court, the pe joined investigation and their custodial interrogation for investigation of the case. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petition required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioners have joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is interim order dated 09.02.2026 is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 7359-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , Advocate for the petitioner(s). . The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to the dated 02.07.2025 registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Lopoke, District Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioners custodial interrogation is no longer required Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.06 20:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document