IN THE 147 Mohd. Arshad State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 323, 341, Police Station City 2. Learned that the petitioner actual custody of been recorded so Mohammad Shehbaz Trial Court vide 4. Learned the petitioner are concession of regular 5. I have parties and have petition. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51200 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD . Mohit Kumar, Advocate for the Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant second petition has been Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.0026 dated 341, 379-B (2), 201, 411, 34 of the City Malerkotla, District Malerkotla Learned counsel appearing on behalf petitioner is in custody since 27.03.2024 of nearly 02 years. He further contends so far. He further contends that Shehbaz has already been granted concession order dated 06.11.2025 passed in Learned State Counsel does not dispute are at par with co-accused Mohammad regular bail has been extended by the have heard learned counsel appearing gone through the documents appended PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 51200-2025(O&M) decision: 12.03.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ petitioner. Punjab. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 27.03.2024 registered under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Malerkotla. behalf of the petitioner contends and has already undergone an contends that no evidence has that similarly placed co-accused concession of regular bail by the BA/1166/2025. dispute that the allegations against Mohammad Shehbaz to whom the Trial Court. appearing on behalf of the respective appended along with the present SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.12 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 147 CRM-M-51200-2025(O&M) 6. Without commenting on the merits and taking into consideration the conceded position as regards parity with co-accused Mohammad Shehbaz, to whom concession of regular bail has been granted by the Trial Court, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 7. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 9. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 12.03.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.12 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document