PRADEEP YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/61056/2025 · 2026-01-15
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 4045 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 4045 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE 207
Pradeep Yadav and State of Haryana
CORAM : HON'BLE
Present :- Ms.
Mr.
Ms.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The BNSS, 2023 for bearing FIR No. 126(2), 127(2), 140(3), Police Station Sector
2. Learned pursuant to the have joined investigation case.
3. Status Kuldeep Kumar, Gurugram on behalf taken on record.
4. Learned averment and submits required for the
5. Heard
6. Since THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-61056
Date of decision: and another
VERSUS Haryana and another
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Ms. Indu Bala and Mr. Rajat Singla, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana
***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to No.289 dated 25.09.2025 registered 140(3), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Sector 9-A, Gurugram.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s)
order dated 31.10.2025 passed by investigation and are no longer required Status report dated 08.01.2026 by Kumar, HPS, Assistant Commisioner behalf of respondent-State has already record. Learned State counsel on instruction submits that the custodial interrogation purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties Since the petitioners have joined
PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 61056-2025(O&M) decision: 15.01.2026
...Petitioners
...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocates for petitioner. Haryana. filed under Section 482 of the to the petitioner(s) in case registered under Sections 115(2), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at petitioner(s) inter alia contends that by this Court, the petitioners required for investigation of the by way of an affidavit of Commisioner of Police, New Colony, already been filed. The same is instructions, corroborates the said interrogation of the petitioners is not parties. the investigation and their SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.16 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 207 CRM-M-61056-2025(O&M)
custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 31.10.2025 is made absolute.
7. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS.
15.01.2026
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.16 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document