CRM-M-12962 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 377 RAMAN ALIAS NANNU AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Dinesh Trehan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Eklawya Darshi, DAG, Punjab Mr. Harsh Thakur, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 22.12.2025, under Sections 115(2)/118/3(5) (Section 110 BNS added later on) at Police Station City Ferozepur (Annexure P the basis of compromise/affidavits 2. This to appear before th and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 12962-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: RAMAN ALIAS NANNU AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Dinesh Trehan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Eklawya Darshi, DAG, Punjab Mr. Harsh Thakur, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 22.12.2025, under Sections 115(2)/118/3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Section 110 BNS added later on) at Police Station City Ferozepur (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on compromise/affidavits dated 27.02.2026 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 10.03.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12962-2026 Date of decision: 30.03.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Eklawya Darshi, DAG, Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.468, dated Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, (Section 110 BNS added later on) at Police Station City Ferozepur, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on 27.02.2026 (Annexure P-2 and P-3). 10.03.2026 had directed the parties e Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.468, dated , Ferozepur, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on had directed the parties e Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.04.01 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-12962 3. CRM-M-12962 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fe the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated been effected between the parties voluntarily and withou undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proce 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 115(2)/118/3(5) added later on) at Police Station City Fe (Annexure P-1) and compromise/affidavits 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 30.03.2026 Gurpreet 12962-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur has submitted report dated 24.03.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and withou undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble eme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.468, dated 22.12.2025, under Sections 115(2)/118/3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 added later on) at Police Station City Fe 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/affidavits dated 27.02.2026 (Annexure P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to edings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble eme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.468, dated 22.12.2025, under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, (Section 110 BNS added later on) at Police Station City Ferozepur, District Ferozepur subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 27.02.2026 (Annexure P-2 and P-3) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur to the effect that the compromise has t any coercion or Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble eme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.468, dated 22.12.2025, under , (Section 110 BNS rozepur, District Ferozepur subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.01 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.