Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 4036 (PNJ)

POKHAR RAM v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/70048/2025 · 2026-01-29

Alok Jain

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (220) POKHAR RAM STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.. case FIR No.194 of BNS of 2023 and 20(b)(ii)(b) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances Act, 1985 a Station Civil Lines Gurgaon, District Gur 2. record. 3. to grant the withdrawal of 4. this stage, without any expression of opinion on the merits of the ca January 29, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH OKHAR RAM Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Haryana Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2. ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for grant of regular bail in No.194 dated 26.09.2025, under Sections 115, 215, 316(2), 85, 89 of BNS of 2023 and 20(b)(ii)(b) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances Act, 1985 and 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act, 1959 Station Civil Lines Gurgaon, District Gurugram. Custody certificate filed by learned State counsel is taken on After arguing for some time, when this court was not inclined concession of bail, learned counsel for the petitioner al of the present petition, at this stage. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at without any expression of opinion on the merits of the ca January 29, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-70048-2025 Date of Decision:- 29.01.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2. The present petition has been filed for grant of regular bail in under Sections 115, 215, 316(2), 85, 89 of BNS of 2023 and 20(b)(ii)(b) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic B)(a) of Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police ugram. Custody certificate filed by learned State counsel is taken on , when this court was not inclined , learned counsel for the petitioner prays for , at this stage. ition is dismissed as withdrawn, at without any expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE ……Petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed for grant of regular bail in under Sections 115, 215, 316(2), 85, 89 of BNS of 2023 and 20(b)(ii)(b) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic registered at Police , when this court was not inclined prays for ition is dismissed as withdrawn, at MANJU 2026.01.31 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document