CRM-M-61841 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 332 MANISH KUMAR ALIAS MUNISH KUMAR AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Gourav Verma, for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. for respondent Nos.2 to 7. RUPINDERJIT 1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Kaithal (Annexu subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 09.10.2025 2. This Court vide order dated to appear before the Illaq and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 61841-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: MANISH KUMAR ALIAS MUNISH KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 7. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Kaithal (Annexure P-1) along with the charge sheet (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 09.10.2025 (Annexure P-3). This Court vide order dated 04.11.2025 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-61841-2025 Date of decision: 23.02.2026 MANISH KUMAR ALIAS MUNISH KUMAR AND OTHERS ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar 1) along with the charge sheet (Annexure P-2) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed 04.11.2025 had directed the parties a/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness ….Petitioners ....Respondents This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar 2) and compromise deed had directed the parties a/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.02.27 20:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-61841 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate Kaithal has compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and witho any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No 7 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proc 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Kaithal (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 09.10.2025 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 23.02.2026 Gurpreet 61841-2025 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kaithal and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate has submitted report dated 19.02.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and witho any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble reme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Kaithal (Annexure P-1) along with the charge sheet (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 09.10.2025 (Annexure P-3) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 19.02.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 to have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to eedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble reme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar e charge sheet (Annexure P-2) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed ) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On First Class, to the effect that the ut to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble reme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar 2) and compromise deed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.02.27 20:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.