Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3997 (PNJ)

SUKHPREET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/64469/2025 · 2026-02-26

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 108-1 Sukhpreet Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. B.S. Bhalla Dr. ( VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case under Sections 21, 27 Substances Act, 1985 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the pur 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is interim order dated 6. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 26.02.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64469 Date of decision: Sukhpreet Singh VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing FIR No.285 s 21, 27-A & 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station Ajnala, District Amritsar Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 17.11.2025 passed by this Court, the has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is interim order dated 17.11.2025 is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 64469-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 29.10.2025 registered Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Ajnala, District Amritsar. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document