IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 128 Kuldeep Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 petitioner in case bearing FIR No. Sections 103, 140, 61, 190, 191 [Section 191(3) added later on] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the case of the petitioner would be very accused Gobind by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court CRM-M-65728- 3. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. 5. In view of the the case of the petitioner would be identical to whom concession of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-73917 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ . Rajat Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present first petition has been filed under Section agarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for tioner in case bearing FIR No.68 dated 08.09.2024 103, 140, 61, 190, 191 [Section 191(3) added later on] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Raman, District Bathinda Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the case of the petitioner would be very similar to the obind Singh, to whom concession of regular bail has been granted ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated -2025. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. In view of the undisputed facts noticed above and the case of the petitioner would be identical to co concession of regular bail has been granted IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 73917-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 25.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab. has been filed under Section 483 of the for grant of regular bail to the 08.09.2024 registered under 103, 140, 61, 190, 191 [Section 191(3) added later on] of the at Police Station Raman, District Bathinda. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends similar to the case of the co- regular bail has been granted vide order dated 29.01.2026 passed in Learned State Counsel does not dispute the aforesaid facts. I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the facts noticed above and noticing that co-accused Gobind Singh, to regular bail has been granted by a Co-ordinate Bench SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.25 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 128 CRM-M-73917-2025(O&M) of this Court vide order dated 29.01.2026 passed in CRM-M-65728-2025, thus with a view to extend parity and keeping the case of the present petitioner at par with the co-accused, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 6. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 25.02.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.25 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document