CRM-M-64572 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 332 (2) MAGHAR SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Anureet Singh Sidhu, for the petitioners. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. Mr. for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of Sections 324, 323, 506, 34 IPC 1860, Police Station Sadar Moga, District Moga (Annexure P basis of compromise 2. This Court vide order dated to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magist of the compromise. 64572-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: MAGHAR SINGH AND OTHERS Versus PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Anureet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Inderpal Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.136, dated 19.12.2023, under Sections 324, 323, 506, 34 IPC 1860, Police Station Sadar Moga, District Moga (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the compromise dated 06.11.2025 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 06.02 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64572-2025 Date of decision: 18.02.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Advocate Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.136, dated 19.12.2023, under Sections 324, 323, 506, 34 IPC 1860, Police Station Sadar Moga, District oceedings arising therefrom on the (Annexure P-2). 02.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded rate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness ….Petitioners ....Respondents This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.136, dated 19.12.2023, under Sections 324, 323, 506, 34 IPC 1860, Police Station Sadar Moga, District oceedings arising therefrom on the had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded rate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.02.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-64572 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional Chief On the basis of the statements Magistrate, Moga compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the princi of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 324, 323, 506, 34 IPC 1860, Police Station Sadar Moga, District Moga (Annexure P basis of compromise 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 18.02.2026 Gurpreet 64572-2025 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, , Moga has submitted report dated 17.02.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.136, dated 19.12.2023, under Sections 324, 323, 506, 34 IPC 1860, Police Station Sadar Moga, District Moga (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the compromise dated 06.11.2025 (Annex Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. so recorded, Additional Chief Judicial 17.02.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. ples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.136, dated 19.12.2023, under Sections 324, 323, 506, 34 IPC 1860, Police Station Sadar Moga, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the (Annexure P-2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. Judicial to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to ples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.136, dated 19.12.2023, under Sections 324, 323, 506, 34 IPC 1860, Police Station Sadar Moga, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.02.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.