CRM-M-67945 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 339 PAL SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Satpal Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. M for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 13.07.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 326, 34, 341, 427 and 506 IPC Police Station Rania, District Sirsa, Haryana (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of (Annexure P-2) 2. Th had directed the their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 67945-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: PAL SINGH AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Satpal Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukhveer S. Killianwali, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 13.07.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 326, 34, 341, 427 and 506 IPC Police Station Rania, District Sirsa, Haryana (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2). The co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-67945-2025 Date of decision: 05.03.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Sukhveer S. Killianwali, Advocate This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.252, dated 13.07.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 326, 34, 341, 427 and 506 IPC, at Police Station Rania, District Sirsa, Haryana (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 13.11.2025 Court vide order dated 03.12.2025 parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. ….Petitioners ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.252, dated at subsequent 13.11.2025 03.12.2025 parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its GURPREET 2026.03.07 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-67945 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate Ellenabad has submitted report dated compromise has been effected bet any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 323, 324, 326, 34, 341, 427 and 506 IPC District Sirsa, Haryana (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of quashed. 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 05.03.2026 Gurpreet 67945-2025 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the dicial Magistrate First Class, Ellenabad and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate has submitted report dated 20.01.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.252, dated 13.07.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 326, 34, 341, 427 and 506 IPC ct Sirsa, Haryana (Annexure P-1) and therefrom on the basis of compromise dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 20.01.2026 to the effect that the ween the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.252, dated 13.07.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 326, 34, 341, 427 and 506 IPC, at Police Station Rania, 1) and subsequent proceedings arising dated 13.11.2025 (Annexure P-2) are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. First Class, to the effect that the ween the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.252, dated 13.07.2016, under at Police Station Rania, subsequent proceedings arising are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.03.07 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.