Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3969 (PNJ)

PRINCE KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/65576/2025 · 2026-02-26

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 104-2 Prince Kumar State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Dr. ( VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing under Sections 109, 118(2), 61(2), 191(3), 190 Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated has joined investigation a case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. 4. Heard lear 5. Since the petitioner custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is interim order dated 6. However, if required, the investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 26.02.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-65576 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Harish Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioner Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing FIR No.0183 under Sections 109, 118(2), 61(2), 191(3), 190 at Police Station Sadar Ludhiana, District Ludhiana. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is interim order dated 20.11.2025 is made absolute. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 65576-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.02.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to 0183 dated 12.08.2025 registered under Sections 109, 118(2), 61(2), 191(3), 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sadar Ludhiana, District Ludhiana. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner nd is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not ned counsel for the parties. has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the is made absolute. petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document