Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3957 (MAD)

T.Loganathan v. District collector

WP/1193/2023 · 2026-04-09

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 1193 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 1193 of 2023 T.Loganathan S/o.Annamalai, No.08, Kollakuppam Village, Kesavarajakuppam, pallipattu Taluk, Thiruvallur District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. District collector Master Plan Complex NH 205, Chennai- Tiruttani Highway, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu- 602 001. 2.The District Revenue officer Thiruvallur. 3.The Special Tahsildar (land Acquisition) Tindivanam- Nagari New Broad Gauge Railway line Project, RDO office, Thiruttani Taluk, Thiruttani Division, Thiruvallur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 and 2 hereinto afford an opportunity of hearing in the Award making proceedings to the petitioner herein in terms of section 7 (5)and 9 of Tamil nadu Acquisition of Land for industrial purpose Act, 1997. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1193 of 2023 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to afford an opportunity of hearing in the Award making proceedings to the petitioner in terms of section 7(5) and 9 of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997. 2. When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents would submit that already sufficient opportunities were provided and an award was also passed. Subsequently, the compensation amount was deposited to the credit of LAOP Court, where the matter is referred to enhancement of compensation. Hence, nothing survives in this petition. 3. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner requests this Court to direct the respondents to provide the details of LAOP Court, where the compensation amount is deposited. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1193 of 2023 5. In view of the above, it is clear that already the award was passed after providing sufficient opportunities to the petitioner. In such case, the prayer in this petition has become infructuous. As requested by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to provide the details with regard to LAOP Court, where the compensation amount is said to have deposited, so as to enable the petitioner to withdraw the said amount. 6. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No cost. 09-04-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.District collector Master Plan Complex NH 205, Chennai- Tiruttani Highway, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu- 602 001. 2.The District Revenue officer Thiruvallur. 3.The Special Tahsildar (land Acquisition) Tindivanam- Nagari New Broad Gauge Railway line Project, RDO office, Thiruttani Taluk, Thiruttani Division, Thiruvallur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1193 of 2023 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 1193 of 2023 09-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis