CRM-M-64662 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 373 DHARMENDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Berwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 02.04.2023, under Sections 379, 420 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari (Annexure P on the basis of 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was dire of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Civil Judge Junior Division/ 64662-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: DHARMENDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Berwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 02.04.2023, under Sections 379, 420 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings ar on the basis of compromise dated 15.10.2025 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 11.03.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Civil Judge Junior Division/Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rewari IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64662-2025 Date of decision: 30.03.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.107, dated 02.04.2023, under Sections 379, 420 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom 15.10.2025 (Annexure P-2). 11.03.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded cted to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rewari and got s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.107, dated 02.04.2023, under Sections 379, 420 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, ising therefrom had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded cted to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got GURPREET 2026.04.02 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-64662 their statements recorded. On the basis of the Judge Junior Division/Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rewari report dated 25.03.2026 between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influen 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 379, 420 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari (Annexure P-1) and compromise dated 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 30.03.2026 Gurpreet 64662-2025 2 their statements recorded. On the basis of the Judge Junior Division/Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rewari 25.03.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influen Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.107, dated 02.04.2023, under Sections 379, 420 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 15.10.2025 (Annexure P-2) Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Civil Judge Junior Division/Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rewari has submitted to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.107, dated 02.04.2023, under Sections 379, 420 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Civil has submitted to the effect that the compromise has been effected Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.107, dated 02.04.2023, under Sections 379, 420 IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.02 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.