Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3945 (PNJ)

RAVINDER KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/56847/2025 · 2026-01-15

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 202 Ravinder Kumar State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Mr. Ms. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The BNSS, 2023 for bearing FIR No. 126(2), 127(2), 140(3), Police Station Sector 2. Learned pursuant to the has joined investigation case. 3. Status Kuldeep Kumar, Gurugram has already taken on record. 4. Learned averment and submits required for the 5. Heard THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-56847 Date of decision: Kumar VERSUS Haryana and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Mr. Rajat Singla and Ms. Indu Bala, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana. ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to No. 289 dated 25.09.2025 registered 140(3), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bhara Sector 9-A, Gurugram. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) order dated 09.10.2025 passed investigation and is no longer required Status report dated 08.01.2026 by Kumar, HPS, Assistant Commissioner already been filed on behalf of respondent record. Learned State counsel on instruction submits that the custodial interrogation purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 56847-2025(O&M) decision: 15.01.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocates for petitioner. Haryana. filed under Section 482 of the to the petitioner(s) in case registered under Sections 115(2), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at petitioner(s) inter alia contends that by this Court, the petitioner required for investigation of the by way of an affidavit of Commissioner of Police, New Colony, respondent-State. The same is instructions, corroborates the said interrogation of the petitioner is not parties. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.16 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 202 CRM-M-56847-2025(O&M) 6. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 09.10.2025 is made absolute. 7. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. 15.01.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.16 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document