UMARDEEN ALIAS AMBU AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/61424/2025 · 2026-01-15
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3944 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3944 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE 203(2)
Umardeen @ Ambu State of Punjab and
CORAM : HON'BLE
Present :- Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
for
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The BNSS, 2023 for bearing FIR No.0086 191(3), 190, 115(2) Mehtiana, District
2. Learned pursuant to the have joined investigation case.
3. Short Palwinder Singh, Chabbewal, District respondent-State.
4. Learned corroborates the of the petitioners
5. Heard THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-61424
Date of decision: Ambu and others
VERSUS and another
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Mr. Ghulam Nabi Malik, Advocate for Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab Mr. Arun Takhi, Advocate the complainant (through V.C.).
***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to No.0086 dated 03.08.2025 registered 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, District Hoshiarpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s)
order dated 03.11.2025 passed by investigation and are no longer required Short reply dated 07.01.2026 by Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent District Hoshiarpur has already State. The same is taken on record. Learned State counsel on instruction the said averment and submits that s is not required for the purpose Heard learned counsel for the parties.
PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 61424-2025(O&M) decision: 15.01.2026
...Petitioners
...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. Punjab.
filed under Section 482 of the to the petitioner(s) in case registered under Sections 140(3), Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station petitioner(s) inter alia contends that by this Court, the petitioners required for investigation of the by way of an affidavit of Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division already been filed on behalf of instructions from SI Gurdeep Singh, that the custodial interrogation of investigation. parties.
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.16 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 203(2) CRM-M-61424-2025(O&M)
6. Since the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 03.11.2025 is made absolute.
7. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS.
15.01.2026
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.16 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document