Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3919 (PNJ)

SATPAL v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/11066/2026 · 2026-04-27

Rupinderjit Chahal

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-11066 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 208 SATPAL STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. Present:- Mr. Rahul Sidher, for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Kumar, for the complainant. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case Sections 115, 117(2), 126, 3(5), 351(3) of and later on added Section 110 of the BNS at Police Station Agroha, District Hisar. 2. On ordinate Bench Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0482 11066-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Rahul Sidher, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0482 dated 18.12.2025 registered under Sections 115, 117(2), 126, 3(5), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on added Section 110 of the BNS at Police Station Agroha, District On 25.02.2026, the following order ordinate Bench of this Court: - “Instant petition has been filed under Sectio Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0482 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11066-2026 Date of decision: 27.04.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondent JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner FIR No.0482 dated 18.12.2025 registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on added Section 110 of the BNS at Police Station Agroha, District following order was passed by the Co- Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0482 ….Petitioner ....Respondent Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner FIR No.0482 dated 18.12.2025 registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on added Section 110 of the BNS at Police Station Agroha, District - n 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0482 GURPREET 2026.04.27 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-11066 dated 18.12.2025 registered under Sections 115, 117(2), 126, 3(5), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on a Hisar. the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has referred to the supplementary statement the son of the complainant, wherein he has stated that petitioner Satpal was not among those, who attacked his father but it is possible that he may have had his nephew, Narendra, resident of Chautala, and his associates to inflict the injuries. He furt submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation. behalf of the respondent stayed. investigating agency and shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. directed to inform the complainant about the pendency of this petition and file compliance report. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions Kumar, has submitted that the petitioner ha longer required for furth 11066-2026 2 dated 18.12.2025 registered under Sections 115, 117(2), 126, 3(5), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on added Section 110 of the BNS at Police Station Agroha, District Hisar. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has referred to the supplementary statement the son of the complainant, wherein he has stated that petitioner Satpal was not among those, who attacked his father but it is possible that he may have had his nephew, Narendra, resident of Chautala, and his associates to inflict the injuries. He furt submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation. Notice of motion. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and seeks time to file status Adjourned to 27.4.2026. In the meanwhile, arrest of the petitioner shall remain stayed. He shall join the investigation and co investigating agency and shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. Investigating Officer through learned State counsel is directed to inform the complainant about the pendency of this petition and file compliance report. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by the Co joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and longer required for further investigation. dated 18.12.2025 registered under Sections 115, 117(2), 126, 3(5), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on dded Section 110 of the BNS at Police Station Agroha, District Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has referred to the supplementary statement of the son of the complainant, wherein he has stated that petitioner- Satpal was not among those, who attacked his father but it is possible that he may have had his nephew, Narendra, resident of Chautala, and his associates to inflict the injuries. He further submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on State and seeks time to file status report. In the meanwhile, arrest of the petitioner shall remain He shall join the investigation and co-operate with the investigating agency and shall not leave the country without Investigating Officer through learned State counsel is directed to inform the complainant about the pendency of this petition and file compliance report.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of Co-ordinate Bench of Court, the Learned counsel for the State, on instructions of ASI Sandeep joined the investigation and is no dated 18.12.2025 registered under Sections 115, 117(2), 126, 3(5), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on dded Section 110 of the BNS at Police Station Agroha, District Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the of - Satpal was not among those, who attacked his father but it is possible that he may have had his nephew, Narendra, resident of her submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on report. In the meanwhile, arrest of the petitioner shall remain operate with the investigating agency and shall not leave the country without Investigating Officer through learned State counsel is directed to inform the complainant about the pendency of this Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of Court, the of ASI Sandeep no GURPREET 2026.04.27 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-11066 5. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the offence committed by petitioner is serious in nature and hence, opposes the grant of bail to the petitioner 6. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, t interim order dated Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS 27.04.2026 Gurpreet 11066-2026 3 Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the offence committed by petitioner is serious in nature and hence, opposes the grant of bail to the petitioner. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, t interim order dated 25.02.2026 passed by the Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the offence committed by petitioner is serious in nature and hence, opposes the In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the offence committed by petitioner is serious in nature and hence, opposes the he this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.27 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.