Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 103-1
Gurpinder Singh @ Rinku State of Punjab
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present :- Mr.
Dr. (
Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the complainant.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case Sections 109, 304, 3(5) of the of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Jhabal, District Tarn Taran
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case.
3. Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. Since the petitioner custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41729 Date of decision: Gurpinder Singh @ Rinku
VERSUS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Kushagra Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the complainant.
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing FIR No.92 dated ns 109, 304, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Jhabal, District Tarn Taran
Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 02.09.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 41729-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.02.2026
...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the complainant. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 07.06.2025 registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Jhabal, District Tarn Taran.
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not Heard learned counsel for the parties. ined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 103-1 CRM-M-41729-2025 (O&M)
interim order dated 02.09.2025 is made absolute.
6. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 26.02.2026
JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document