Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3844 (PNJ)

NEERAJ RANI AND ORS v. JOGINDER SINGH AND ORS

FAO/4767/2019 · 2026-04-27

Nidhi Gupta

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-4767 IN THE HIG 112 Neeraj Rani Joginder Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. seek enhanc the learned Award date MACP/182/2 Vehicles Ac 2. delay of 213 inception, th 17.07.2023 a learned prox on behalf of 3. appearance o date of heari 67-2019 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o j Rani and others Versus er Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the instant ap nhancement of compensation amount arned Motor Accident Claims Tribuna dated 29.05.2018 passed in M /182/2010 dated 09.08.2010 filed un les Act, 1988. The matter pertains to the yea 213 days. Notice in the appeal is ion, the present appeal has been l 2023 and 14.11.2023; and the same w d proxy counsel for the appellant and o alf of the appellants, respectively. Today, even in the second roun rance on behalf of the appellants. Simi f hearing, as well. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-4767-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA tant appeal, the appellant-claimants mount of ₹12,79,600/- awarded by ribunal, Panchkula, vide impugned in MACT Case bearing No. led under Section 166 of the Motor e year 2019 and has been filed with peal is yet to be issued. Since the een listed for two times i.e. on ame was adjourned at the request of t and on account of non-appearance d round of haring, none has put in Similar, is the position on the last s by ned No. otor with the . on st of ance t in last RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.27 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-4767 4. have exhibit litigation. It Court has be the interest o utterly casua nor their cou Thus, this Co non-prosecu 5. 6. 27.04.2026 rishu 67-2019 (O&M) -2- A bare reading of the above fa exhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, th sual and careless approach. It is cl counsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other option e rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ove facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellants in and, the appellants have adopted an It is clear that neither the appellants sted in pursuing the present matter. ption except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No sent the in d an tter. for RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.27 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.