CRM-M-28414 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 320 AMIT AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Ms. Ruby Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana Ms. Ekta, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 8 RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 324(4), 351(3) of 2023, at Police Station subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 25.04.2025 (Annexure P 2. This Court vide order dated to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statemen and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 28414-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: AMIT AND OTHERS Versus HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Ruby Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana Ms. Ekta, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 8. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 324(4), 351(3) of at Police Station Purani Sabzi Mandi, Rohtak subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 25.0 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statemen and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28414-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.02.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik No.65, dated 15.03.2025, under 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 324(4), 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Purani Sabzi Mandi, Rohtak (Annexure P-1), and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 09.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness - ….Petitioners ....Respondents petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, , and dated had directed the parties ts recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.02.19 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-28414 3. CRM-M-28414 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional Chief recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Magistrate, Rohtak the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No 8 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings befo 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court i SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 324(4), 351(3) of 2023, at Police Station subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 25.04.2025 (Annexure P 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 16.02.2026 Gurpreet 28414-2025 (O&M) Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Rohtak has submitted report dated the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without ion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No. 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 324(4), 351(3) of at Police Station Purani Sabzi Mandi, Rohtak subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of (Annexure P-2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No -2- Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Rohtak and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Chief Judicial has submitted report dated 17.10.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 to have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to re the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble n Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.65, dated 15.03.2025, under 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 324(4), 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Purani Sabzi Mandi, Rohtak (Annexure P-1), and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No - Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements Judicial to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble n Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, , and dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.02.19 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.