CR-1368-2023 (O&M) 150 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Rajender Singh and another Versus Surya Dev Rana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate for respondent No.1. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to an order dated Division), Kharkhoda, Sonepat vide which application under Order 21 Rule 32 read with Section 151 CPC filed by respondent well as for setting aside the order dated 02.02.2023 (P objection filed by the petitioner/ JD were ordered to be dismissed. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that vide order dated 23.09.2025, t disposed of with the consent of both the parties. 3. The abovesaid fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view thereof, no revision petition. 5. Dispo 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 05.05.2026 sanjay Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1368 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 Rajender Singh and another Versus Surya Dev Rana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Divyam Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. R.S. Malik, Advocate for respondent No.1. -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to an order dated 12.09.2017 (P-2) passed by Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kharkhoda, Sonepat vide which application under Order 21 Rule 32 read with Section 151 CPC filed by respondent well as for setting aside the order dated 02.02.2023 (P objection filed by the petitioner/ JD were ordered to be dismissed. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that vide order dated 23.09.2025, the execution proceedings have been disposed of with the consent of both the parties. The abovesaid fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the In view thereof, no further cause survives in the present Disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1368-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 ….Petitioners …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to 2) passed by Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kharkhoda, Sonepat vide which application under Order 21 Rule 32 read with Section 151 CPC filed by respondent No.1 was allowed as well as for setting aside the order dated 02.02.2023 (P-10); whereby objection filed by the petitioner/ JD were ordered to be dismissed. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that he execution proceedings have been disposed of with the consent of both the parties. The abovesaid fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the cause survives in the present Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 …Respondents By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to 2) passed by Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kharkhoda, Sonepat vide which application under Order 21 Rule No.1 was allowed as 10); whereby At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that he execution proceedings have been The abovesaid fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the cause survives in the present Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand SANJAY GUPTA 2026.05.05 19:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document