CRM-M-13122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 378 RENU AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Varlin Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Eklawya Darshi, DAG, Punjab Ms. Bhupinder Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 06.01.2026, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 190 Sanhita, 2023 (Annexure P-1) and compromise dated 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 13122-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: RENU AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Varlin Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Eklawya Darshi, DAG, Punjab Ms. Bhupinder Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 06.01.2026, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 190 Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Sadar Budhlada, Budhlada, D 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 25/26.02.2026 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 11.03.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13122-2026 Date of decision: 30.03.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Eklawya Darshi, DAG, Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.02, dated 06.01.2026, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 190 Bharatiya Nyaya , at Police Station Sadar Budhlada, Budhlada, District Mansa subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 25/26.02.2026 (Annexure P-3). 11.03.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.02, dated Bharatiya Nyaya istrict Mansa subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of had directed the parties their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.04.01 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-13122 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Budhlada recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Magistrate, Budhlada the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion o 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the tria 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Sing SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 190 Station Sadar Budhlada, Budhlada, District Mansa (Annexure subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 25/26.02.2026 (Annexure P 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 30.03.2026 Gurpreet 13122-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Budhlada recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Magistrate, Budhlada has submitted report dated the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.02, dated 06.01.2026, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 190 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Station Sadar Budhlada, Budhlada, District Mansa (Annexure subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 25/26.02.2026 (Annexure P-3) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Budhlada and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Sub Divisional Judicial has submitted report dated 20.03.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to l Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble h Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.02, dated 06.01.2026, under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Sadar Budhlada, Budhlada, District Mansa (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the atements Sub Divisional Judicial to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble h Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.02, dated 06.01.2026, under , at Police 1) and dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.01 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.