IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 247 Yatin Miglani State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Ms. Divya Gulati, Advocate for Mr. L.M. Gulati Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 respondents No.1 & 2 fresh inquiries in case bear under Sections 406/420/120 Station City Rajpura, District Patiala once the anticipatory bail application of accused-respondent 2. Since the investigation in the transferred to District Sangrur infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the present petition having been rendered infructuous 4. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 27.04.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38238 Date of decision: VERSUS and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Ms. Divya Gulati, Advocate for Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 respondents No.1 & 2 to direct the respondents No. 3 and 4 not to initiate fresh inquiries in case bearing FIR No.0063 dated 07.04.2025 registered under Sections 406/420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 Station City Rajpura, District Patiala once the anticipatory bail application of respondent No.7 has already been dismissed by the Court ince the investigation in the present to District Sangrur, hence, the present petition has been rendered In view of the above, the present petition having been rendered infructuous. ending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 38238-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 27.04.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab. present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for seeking directions to to direct the respondents No. 3 and 4 not to initiate .0063 dated 07.04.2025 registered Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala once the anticipatory bail application of No.7 has already been dismissed by the Court. present case has already been the present petition has been rendered In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as ending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.28 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document