KASHMIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. M/S AMARA BREWERIES PVT LTD AND OTHERS
CR/5967/2023 · 2026-04-22
Vikas Bahl
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3721 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3721 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-5967-2023 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***
CR-5967-2023
Date of decision : 22.04.2026
Kashmir Singh and others
... Petitioners
Versus
M/s Amara Breweries Pvt. Ltd. and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: Mr.Lokendra Singh, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr.Kuljit Singh, Advocate for
Mr.Peeush Gagneja, Advocate
for respondents no.1 and 2.
VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
1.
On 27.11.2024, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
“Present: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, Advocate for Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. *****
Power of Attorney has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 and the same is taken on record.
As per office report, respondents No.4, 5 and 8 have died and notice issued to respondent No.7 has been received back with the report that he is not residing at the given address in Patiala and respondents DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.04.22 17:27 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment
CR-5967-2023 2
No.6 has refused to accept the summon. Service of respondent No.6 is deemed to be effected as per law.
Appellant is directed to take necessary steps to implead LRs of respondents No.4, 5 and 8 and provide correct address of respondent No.7 within 15 days and thereafter, fresh notice be issued to respondent No.7 for 21.05.2025. November 27, 2024”
2.
On 21.05.2025, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
“Present: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, Advocate
for the petitioners.
****
Order dated 27.11.2024 has not been complied with by the petitioners, as reported by the registry.
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks last opportunity to comply with the order dated 27.11.2024.
Adjourned to 16.12.2025. May 21, 2025”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the above, the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioners to revive the present petition after complying with the earlier orders passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
4.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE April 22, 2026. Davinder Kumar
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.04.22 17:27 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment