Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3717 (MAD)

P.J. SRINIVASAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/20372/2023 · 2026-03-24

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 20372 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 20372 of 2023 P.J. Srinivasan, S/o.Jayavel @ Jaya Naidu, No.3, Pandian Street,Nanthavana Mettur, Avadi, Chennai- 600 071. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Tiruvallur District. 2.The Special Thasildar (aadhi Dravidar Welfare), Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 3.The Thasildar, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to cancel the illegal acquisition in respect of the Petitioners Pata land in S.F. No. 296/ 2C1A sub - divided in S.F. No. 296 /2C1B, Ramakrishnapuram, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20372 of 2023 cherukkanur village, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District by considering the Petitioners representation dated 11.03.2021and 21.06.2023. For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents herein to cancel the illegal acquisition in respect of the petitioner’s patta land in S.F. No. 296/ 2C1A Sub - divided in S.F. No. 296 /2C1B, Ramakrishnapuram, cherukkanur village, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District by considering the Petitioners representation dated 11.03.2021and 21.06.2023. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3.Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the land was already acquired from the petitioner and that might be the reason for non appearance of the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20372 of 2023 4.Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, recording the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 24-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Tiruvallur District. 2.The Special Thasildar, (Aadhi Dravidar Welfare), Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 3.The Thasildar, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20372 of 2023 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst WP No. 20372 of 2023 24-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis