SURENDRA JENA v. ER. STUTAM DAS,EXE.ENGINEER,TPCODL,BBSR
CONTC/3373/2023 · 2026-04-17
K R Mohapatra
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 371 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 371 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.3373 of 2023
Surendra Jena …. Petitioner None
-versus- Er. Stutam Das, Executive Engineer, TPCODL, Bhubaneswar …. Opp. Party
Mr. Lalit Kumar Moharana, Advocate (for TPCODL)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No. 17.04.2026
04.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call.
3. Mr. Maharana, learned counsel for the TPCODL is present
4. This CONTC has been filed alleging noncompliance of
order dated 21st February, 2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.4203 of 2023.
5. Vide order dated 21st February, 2023 passed in W.P.(C) No.4203 of 2023, this Court directed that in the event the Petitioner makes an online application to the Executive Engineer, TPCODL, Kalinganagar, Bhubaneswar complete in all respect, the same shall be considered in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably p. 2 within a period of seven days from making such application and result thereof should be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. Compliance affidavit has been filed by the Sub- Divisional Officer, Khandagiri Electrical Sub-Division, TPCODL stating that the Petitioner made an online application on “Mo Bidyut Portal” vide application No.TPC 10367840 dated 6th April, 2023 along with a copy of the ROR and an affidavit-cum-undertaking. While processing such application, it was found that the ROR in respect of the premises to which the Petitioner sought for power connection stood in the name of different persons other than the Petitioner. Hence, his application was rejected and refund process was initiated. It is also stated in the compliance affidavit that the said refund shall be credited as and when the details of the bank account is furnished by the Petitioner.
7. In view of the above, this Court finds that the order of this Court has already been complied with.
8. Hence, the CONTC is dropped.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge Himansu