VARINDER KUMAR PATWARI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/24041/2023 · 2026-04-20
Namit Kumar
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3706 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3706 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 250 CWP-24041-2023 Date of decision : 20.04.2026 Varinder Kumar Patwari ….Petitioner V/S State of Punjab and others
….Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Manish Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, A.A.G., Punjab. **** NAMIT KUMAR
, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the enquiry report dated 28.06.2023 (Annexure P-8), order dated 16.09.2023 (Annexure P-10) and order dated 29.09.2023 (Annexure P-11), passed by respondent No.2, whereby, punishment of 5% cut in pension has been imposed upon the petitioner and for quashing the letter dated 25.09.2023 (Annexure P-12), which has been sent by respondent No.4 to Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Mukerian Branch, for effecting recovery from the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced copy of the
order dated 08.04.2025 passed in COCP No.2505 of 2023 titled as ‘Varinder Kumar Patwari (Retd.) Vs. Smt. Komal Mittal, (IAS), Deputy Commissioner, Hoshiarpur and another’ and submits that in view of the said order, the petitioner does not want to pursue the present petition. Copy of order dated 08.04.2025 is taken on record.
3. Dismissed as not pressed. 20.04.2026
(NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.04.20 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document