CR-3697-2023 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3697-2023 Date of decision: 20.04.2026 Nirmal Singh ...Pe$$oner Versus Gulzar Singh (deceased) through his LRs and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. M.S. Ba/h, Advocate for the pe$$oner. Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate for the respondents. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Applica$on under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC moved by the plain$ffs in Civil Suit No.225/2022 $tled ‘Gulzar Singh and another vs. Nirmal Singh’, was dismissed by the trial Court. However, the Appellate Court by way of the impugned order dated 20.05.2023 (Annexure P-7) allowed the appeal, whereby defendant – respondents were restrained from interfering in the cu@ng and removing of the popular trees by the plain$ffs. 2. The aforesaid order has been assailed by the defendant. 3. Before this Court, it is conceded that pursuant to the order dated 20.05.2023, the popular trees in ques$on have already been cut and removed by the plain$ffs. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present revision has been rendered as infructuous. However, the pe$$oner herein i.e. the defendant will be at liberty to move an appropriate applica$on before the trial Court concerned, for the price of the popular trees as cut by the plain$ffs, in case, the defendant – pe$$oner herein or Gram Panchayat is found en$tled thereto. 20.04.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.04.20 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document