CRM-M-70472 IN T 395 VIKAS SHAR STATE OF PU CORAM:- HO Present: Mr for Mr Mr for RUPINDERJIT 1. Th Suraksha Sanh 02.05.2023, und Navi Baradari, and subsequent dated 16.10.202 2. Th to appear befor and the learned of the comprom 70472-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da HARMA ALIAS CHEENU AND A Versus F PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Mr. Ashish Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Manhav Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Se Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quas , under Sections 451, 323, 506, 394 adari, District Police Commissionera equent proceedings arising therefrom 10.2025 (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 26.02 before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to arned Magistrate was directed to send promise. PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-70472-2025 Date of decision: 07.04.2026 ND ANOTHER &.Petitioners ....Respondents UPINDERJIT CHAHAL cate der Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik quashing of FIR No.64, dated , 394 and 149 IPC, at Police Station sionerate Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) refrom on the basis of compromise 26.02.2026 had directed the parties rate to get their statements recorded o send its report qua the genuineness s ents garik ated ation ) mise rties rded ness GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-70472 3. Pur Judicial Magist On the basis of Jalandhar has compromise ha any coercion or 4. Lea have not dispute 5. In continue with th 6. Fol of this Court in another 2007 Supreme Court SCC 303, this Sections 451, 3 District Police proceedings ari (Annexure P-2 7. Pen of, accordingly. 07.04.2026 Gurpreet 70472-2025 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, pa agistrate First Class, Jalandhar and asis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 19.03. ise has been effected between the p ion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as disputed the factum of compromise bet In view of the above, no useful with the proceedings before the trial C Following the principles laid down ourt in Kulwinder Singh and others 007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 an ourt in Gian Singh Versus State of , this petition is allowed and FIR No 451, 323, 506, 394 and 149 IPC, at olice Commissionerate Jalandhar (A gs arising therefrom on the basis of 2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application ingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Pending miscellaneous application ingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No er, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. ded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 19.03.2026 to the effect that the the parties voluntarily and without ell as counsel for respondent No.2 ise between the parties. useful purpose would be served to trial Court in the instant FIR. d down by the Full Bench judgment hers Versus State of Punjab and 2 and approved by the Hon9ble te of Punjab and others (2012) 10 IR No.64, dated 02.05.2023, under C, at Police Station Navi Baradari, (Annexure P-1) and subsequent sis of compromise dated 16.10.2025 lication(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No e the rded. lass, t the thout No.2 d to ment nd ble 10 nder dari, uent 2025 osed AL) GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.