Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3662 (MAD)

Muthukumar.P v. The Commissioner

WP(MD)/93/2023 · 2026-03-24

G R Swaminathan, R Poornima

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.93 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA W.P(MD)No.93 of 2023 P.Muthukumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation, Madurai – 625 002. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation, North Zone Office (Zone-2), Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. 3.The Town Planning Officer, North Zone Office (Zone-2), Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. 4.The Assistant Engineer, Ward No.63, North Zone Office (Zone-2), Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.93 of 2023 remove all encroachment available in either side of common road of 1st cross of Fathima Nagar 1st Street of Ward No.63 (Old Ward No.21), Madurai Municipal Corporation as per the sketch of Municipal records and ensure the Roads having street lights can be used by the publics without any hindrances and any other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances and render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Samy For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinayak Standing Counsel ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides. 2.The petitioner wants the petition-mentioned encroachments to be removed by the municipal authorities. 3.The learned Standing Counsel for the Madurai Corporation points out that not even a single encroacher has been impleaded and that the petitioner is attempting to obtain an order behind their back. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.93 of 2023 4.We find considerable force in this objection. This writ petition suffers from the vice of non-joinder of necessary parities. It is seen that the petitioner has already filed a civil suit and obtained a decree for mandatory injunction in respect of the very same subject matter. The petitioner is at liberty to execute the same. The petitioner cannot be allowed to ride two horses at the same time. 5.The Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. [G.R.S., J.] [R.P, J.] 24.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To 1.The Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation, Madurai – 625 002. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation, North Zone Office (Zone-2), Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.93 of 2023 3.The Town Planning Officer, North Zone Office (Zone-2), Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. 4.The Assistant Engineer, Ward No.63, North Zone Office (Zone-2), Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.93 of 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND R.POORNIMA , J. MGA W.P(MD)No.93 of 2023 24.03.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis