CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 128 KULWANT KAUR SANDHU STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA P Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 15.05.2025 Class-20 virtue of abovementioned order proclaimed person. 2. 3. Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State -20225-2026(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH KULWANT KAUR SANDHU VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P Ms. Jyoti Sareen, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, seeking 15.05.2025 (Annexure P-11) passed by the learned Jalandhar, hereinafter being referred to as ‘trial Court’ virtue of abovementioned order the pe proclaimed person. Notice of motion. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20225-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 17.04.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of ‘the Bharatiya ’, seeking for quashing of order dated ) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First referred to as ‘trial Court’ only. By the petitioner has been declared Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby (O&M) .2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS Bharatiya for quashing of order dated Judicial Magistrate First only. By titioner has been declared a Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, accepts notice on behalf of is hereby VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.04.18 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- dispensed with. However, n learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition 4. the petitioner has been prosecuted respondent No.2, for the petitioner any summon or warrant was never residing at the given address. 5. any summons and that the offence for which 6. a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court a period of learned trial Court bail, the learned trial Court Vinod -20225-2026(O&M) dispensed with. However, no formal reply has been filed by the State and the learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner has been prosecuted in a complaint case respondent No.2, under Negotiable Instruments Act for the petitioner, in the abovementioned complaint, after summoning order any summon or warrant was never served upon residing at the given address. In view of the fact that the petitioner any summons and she has not violated any condition of bail, the offence for which she has been summoned In view of above, the present petition is hereby a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court a period of one month from today. If the petitioner learned trial Court within the stipulated period bail, the learned trial Court shall admit the petitioner to bail on the same 2 formal reply has been filed by the State and the learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in a complaint case, filed by the under Negotiable Instruments Act. As per learned counsel in the abovementioned complaint, after summoning order served upon her, and that she was not the fact that the petitioner has never been served with he has not violated any condition of bail, it is hereby held en summoned, still remains bailable. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court within the petitioner surrenders before the stipulated period and moves an application for shall admit the petitioner to bail on the same day formal reply has been filed by the State and the that , filed by the . As per learned counsel in the abovementioned complaint, after summoning order was not has never been served with it is hereby held with within before the application for day. VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.04.18 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document