CRM-M-9851 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 273 RAJESH AND ORS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 25.07.2019, under Sections 323, 34, 506 of IPC, at PS Sampla, District Rohtak (Annexure P basis of compromise 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rohtak the basis of the st 9851-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: RAJESH AND ORS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Saurabh Garg, Advocate for respondent No ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 25.07.2019, under Sections 323, 34, 506 of IPC, at PS Sampla, District Rohtak (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the compromise dated 28.08.2024 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 25.0 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded arned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the parties Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rohtak and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9851-2026 Date of decision: 17.04.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. , Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.339, dated 25.07.2019, under Sections 323, 34, 506 of IPC, at PS Sampla, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the 28.08.2024 (Annexure P-2). .03.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded arned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness the parties have appeared before and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.339, dated 25.07.2019, under Sections 323, 34, 506 of IPC, at PS Sampla, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded arned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness have appeared before and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, GURPREET 2026.04.21 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-9851 Rohtak has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel a and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Followin of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (201 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 323, 34, 506 of IPC, at PS Sampla, District Rohtak (Annexure P and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 28.08.2024 (Annexure P 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 17.04.2026 Gurpreet 9851-2026 2 has submitted report dated 09.04.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (201 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.339, dated 25.07.2019, under Sections 323, 34, 506 of IPC, at PS Sampla, District Rohtak (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 28.08.2024 (Annexure P-2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No 09.04.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without s well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. g the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.339, dated 25.07.2019, under Sections 323, 34, 506 of IPC, at PS Sampla, District Rohtak (Annexure P-1) subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without s well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to g the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble 2) 10 FIR No.339, dated 25.07.2019, under 1) compromise Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.21 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.