CRM-M-10584 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 302 MANPREET SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Rahul Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ekompal Sagoo, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Yagsimant Attri, Advocate for respondent No.2 to 4. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 08.07.2024, under Sections 325, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Bareta District Mansa, (Annexure P on the basis of 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Budhlada 10584-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: MANPREET SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Rahul Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ekompal Sagoo, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Yagsimant Attri, Advocate for respondent No.2 to 4. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 08.07.2024, under Sections 325, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Bareta District Mansa, (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedin on the basis of compromise dated 07.01.2026 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 02.04.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Budhlada and got their statements recorded. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10584-2026 Date of decision: 24.04.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Ekompal Sagoo, AAG, Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.80, dated 08.07.2024, under Sections 325, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Bareta subsequent proceedings arising therefrom 07.01.2026 (Annexure P-3). 02.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.80, dated 08.07.2024, under Sections 325, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Bareta gs arising therefrom had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. GURPREET 2026.04.24 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-10584 On the basis of the statements so record Budhlada has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counse 4 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 325, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Bareta District Mansa, (Annexure P-1) and compromise dated 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 24.04.2026 Gurpreet 10584-2026 2 On the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 18.04.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counse have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 is petition is allowed and FIR No.80, dated 08.07.2024, under Sections 325, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Bareta District Mansa, 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 07.01.2026 (Annexure P-3) Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No ed, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 18.04.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 to have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.80, dated 08.07.2024, under Sections 325, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Bareta District Mansa, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 3) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Judicial Magistrate First Class, to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.80, dated 08.07.2024, under Sections 325, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Bareta District Mansa, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.24 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.