CRM-M-13387 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 256 DINESH CHALIA AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Ms. Sirat Sapra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 11.03.2024, under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2) BNS, at PS Karnal City, District Karnal (Annexure P on the basis of 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. P Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karnal the basis of the statements so recorded, 13387-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: DINESH CHALIA AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Sirat Sapra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 5. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 11.03.2024, under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2) BNS, at PS Karnal City, District Karnal (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 07.02.2026 (Annexure This Court vide order dated 12.03.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the parties Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karnal and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karnal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13387-2026 Date of decision: 18.04.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Sirat Sapra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Rahul Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 5. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.193, dated 11.03.2024, under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2) BNS, at PS Karnal City, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom 07.02.2026 (Annexure P-2). 12.03.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness the parties have appeared before and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karnal s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.193, dated 11.03.2024, under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2) BNS, at PS Karnal City, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness have appeared before and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karnal GURPREET 2026.04.18 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-13387 has submitted report dated been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 5 have not disputed the factum of compromise between 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2) BNS, at PS Karnal City, District Karnal (Annexure P-1) and compromise dated 7. Pending miscell of, accordingly. 18.04.2026 Gurpreet 13387-2026 2 has submitted report dated 30.03.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.193, dated 11.03.2024, under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2) BNS, at PS Karnal City, District Karnal 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 07.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 to have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment rs Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.193, dated 11.03.2024, under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2) BNS, at PS Karnal City, District Karnal subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2) are quashed. aneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment rs Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.193, dated 11.03.2024, under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2) BNS, at PS Karnal City, District Karnal subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of aneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.18 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.