Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3585 (PNJ)

GURJEET SINGH ALIAS JEET AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/11303/2026 · 2026-04-06

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 206 Gurjeet Singh @ Jeet and another State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Dr. ( Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioners in case bearing FIR No.15 dated 16.01.2024 registered under Sections 302, 459, 323, 325, 506, 148, 149 of the [now Sections 103, 331(7), 115(2), 117(2), 351(2) & (3), 191(3) & 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023] Mansa. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated have surrendered before the Trial bonds, they have already been 12.03.2026 by the Trial Court 3. Learned State counsel 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11303 Date of decision: Gurjeet Singh @ Jeet and another VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Manjit Singh Uppal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the petitioners in case bearing FIR No.15 dated 16.01.2024 registered under Sections 302, 459, 323, 325, 506, 148, 149 of the [now Sections 103, 331(7), 115(2), 117(2), 351(2) & (3), 191(3) & 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023] at Police Station Sadar Mansa, District Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 26.02.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner endered before the Trial Court and on they have already been granted concession of bail vide order dated by the Trial Court. Learned State counsel does not dispute the aforesaid facts Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioners have already been granted concession of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 11303-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.04.2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate for the complainant. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case bearing FIR No.15 dated 16.01.2024 registered under Sections 302, 459, 323, 325, 506, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [now Sections 103, 331(7), 115(2), 117(2), 351(2) & (3), 191(3) & 190 of at Police Station Sadar Mansa, District Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioners Court and on their furnishing bail/surety granted concession of bail vide order dated does not dispute the aforesaid facts. Heard learned counsel for the parties. already been granted concession of SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.06 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 206 CRM-M-11303-2026 (O&M) interim bail by the Trial Court, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 26.02.2026 is made absolute. 6. However, if required, the petitioners shall continue to appear before the Trial Court. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 06.04.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.06 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document