IN TH 136 Chandan S Dakshin H Engineer a CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU CM-8395 17 days in allowed an condoned. RSA-2490 1. concurrent the suit for was dismis RSA-2490-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.2 Date of decision :-19.01.202 ndan Singh @ Chander Singh Versus hin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam L neer and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate for the appellant. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) 8395-C-2023 Prayer in this application is f ays in refiling the present appeal. For the reasons mentioned in ed and the delay of 17 days in ref oned. The application stands dispose 2490-2023 The plaintiff/appellant is in urrent findings rendered by the learne uit for declaration and mandatory inju dismissed. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH l No.2490 of 2023 (O & M) .2026 …..Appellant am Ltd. through its Executive …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA cate n is for condonation of delay of ed in the application, the same is in refiling the present appeal is sposed of. is in second appeal against the learned District Courts, whereby injunction filed by the plaintiff VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.21 18.39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2. of law invo Civil Cour 2003, has s Court vide titled as 'M and other c 3. disposed o the approp with law. 4. made in th res judicat plaintiff. 5. January 1 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-2490-2023 (O & M) Learned counsel for the appe w involved in the present appeal as to Court is barred in view of Section , has since been decided by the Hon' t vide judgment dated 14.05.2025 p 'Mahesh Kumar vs. Sub Divisio ther connected appeal(s), Law Finder In view of the above, the osed of, with liberty to the appellant ppropriate remedy as available to pro law. It is made clear that any evid in the impugned judgments and dec icata in any subsequent proceedings Pending application(s), if any, ary 19, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No 2 appellant submits that question l as to whether jurisdiction of the ction 145 of the Electricity Act, e Hon'ble Division Bench of this 2025 passed in RSA-4181-2016 Divisional Officer and Another Finder Doc Id # 2730461. , the present second appeal is ellant-plaintiff to take recourse to to prove his case, in accordance y evidence recorded/observations nd decrees would not operate as edings initiated by the appellant- if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.21 18.39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document