Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3548 (PNJ)

PRINCE ALIAS PAPPAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/73557/2025 · 2026-04-06

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-73557 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 375 PRINCE ALIAS PAPPAL STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Bhaskar Sorout, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 15.04.2024, under Section 379 Rewari, District Rewari (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistra of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rewari 73557-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: PRINCE ALIAS PAPPAL Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Bhaskar Sorout, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 15.04.2024, under Section 379-A of IPC, at Police Station 13 Rewari, District Rewari (Annexure P-1) and therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 16.12.2025 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 17.02.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rewari IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-73557-2025 Date of decision: 06.04.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.125, dated A of IPC, at Police Station 13-17, City 1) and subsequent proceedings arising 16.12.2025 (Annexure P-2). 17.02.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded te was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rewari and got their statements ….Petitioner ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.125, dated 17, City ceedings arising had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded te was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements GURPREET 2026.04.08 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-73557 recorded. On the basis of the statement Sessions Judge, Rewari that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel a and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Followi of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (20 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Section 379-A of IPC, at Police Station 13 (Annexure P-1) and compromise dated 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 06.04.2026 Gurpreet 73557-2025 2 recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Sessions Judge, Rewari has submitted report dated that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (20 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.125, dated 15.04.2024, under A of IPC, at Police Station 13-17, City Rewari, District Rewari 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 16.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No s so recorded, Additional District and has submitted report dated 27.02.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and s well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. ng the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.125, dated 15.04.2024, under 17, City Rewari, District Rewari subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Additional District and to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and .2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to ng the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble 12) 10 FIR No.125, dated 15.04.2024, under 17, City Rewari, District Rewari subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.08 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.