CRM-M-12505 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 305 BHAWANI SINGH STATE OF HARYANA & ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. N.S. for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Harsh Manocha, Advocate for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 08.02.2025, under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, at Police Station Cyber Crime Central, Faridabad (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of P-2). 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 12505-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: BHAWANI SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. N.S. Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Harsh Manocha, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 08.02.2025, under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, at Police Station Cyber Crime Central, Faridabad (Annexure P-1) and therefrom on the basis of compromise/settlement This Court vide order dated 09.03.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12505-2026 Date of decision: 27.03.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.34, dated 08.02.2025, under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, at Police Station Cyber 1) and subsequent proceedings arising compromise/settlement dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure 09.03.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness ….Petitioner ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.34, dated 08.02.2025, under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, at Police Station Cyber subsequent proceedings arising 29.08.2025 (Annexure had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.03.30 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-12505 3. CRM-M-12505 3. Pu Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridabad On the basis of the statements so recorded, Faridabad has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 318(4), Faridabad (Annexure P the basis of compromise/settlement quashed. 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, of, accordingly. 27.03.2026 Gurpreet 12505-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridabad and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 23.03.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.34, dated 08.02.2025, under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, at Police Station Cyber Crime Central, Faridabad (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on compromise/settlement dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No rsuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 23.03.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment rs Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.34, dated 08.02.2025, under 61(2) of BNS, at Police Station Cyber Crime Central, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on 29.08.2025 (Annexure P-2) are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No rsuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. Judicial Magistrate First Class, to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment rs Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.34, dated 08.02.2025, under 61(2) of BNS, at Police Station Cyber Crime Central, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on are stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.03.30 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.