CRM-M-11923 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 304 SHRUTI SHREYA AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Balvinder Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Aarjav Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 16.08.2021, under Sections 67, 67 Women Police Station NIT Faridabad (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 17.02.2026 (Annexure P 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 11923-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: SHRUTI SHREYA AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Balvinder Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Aarjav Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 16.08.2021, under Sections 67, 67-A of IT Act and 120 Women Police Station NIT Faridabad (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 17.02.2026 (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 06.03.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded ned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11923-2026 Date of decision: 27.03.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Balvinder Sangwan, Advocate Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.176, dated A of IT Act and 120-B, 506 IPC, at Women Police Station NIT Faridabad (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 06.03.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded ned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.176, dated B, 506 IPC, at ent dated had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded ned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.04.01 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-11923 3. CRM-M-11923 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridabad On the basis of the s Faridabad has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Follo of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others ( SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 67, 67 NIT Faridabad (Annexure P on the basis of quashed. 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 27.03.2026 Gurpreet 11923-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridabad and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 24.03.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others ( , this petition is allowed and FIR No.176, dated 16.08.2021, under Sections 67, 67-A of IT Act and 120-B, 506 IPC, at Women Police Station NIT Faridabad (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 17.02.2026 (Annexure P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. tatements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 24.03.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. wing the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.176, dated 16.08.2021, under B, 506 IPC, at Women Police Station subsequent proceedings arising therefrom 17.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. Judicial Magistrate First Class, to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to wing the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble 2012) 10 FIR No.176, dated 16.08.2021, under B, 506 IPC, at Women Police Station subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.04.01 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.