Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No. 948 of 2023 Premanjali Behura ..... Petitioner Mr. J.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- Prof. Dr. Nirmal Chandra Mohapatra, Director, Regional Spinal Injury Centre ..... Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 27.02.2026 Order No. 07 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. J.K. Mohapatra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. P.K. Panda, learned Addl. Standing Counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. In course of hearing learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that in the meantime and while complying the order passed by the Apex Court, Petitioner has been provided with the appointment vide order dtd.24.02.2026. But it is contended that in view of the order passed by the Apex Court, Petitioner is eligible to get the benefit of arrear salary. 4. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel on the other hand contended that since in terms of the order passed by the Apex Court, Petitioner as contended, has already been appointed, due to compliance of the order, no further contempt lies. 5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties, considering the submission made and the fact that Petitioner has been Page 2 of 2. provided with the appointment vide order dtd.24.02.2026, this Court is of the view that the order has been complied with. It is open for the Petitioner to make his grievance before the appropriate authority, if he has got any further grievance. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha