CRM-M-33631- IN THE H (204) REKHA RANI STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. V Ms. S Mr. N Mr. P MANISHA BATR 1. Throu Bharatiya Nagarik seeks anticipatory Sections 115(2), Sanhita, 2023 at P 2. Vide was released on in 3. Learn though it is not spe -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH Versus
PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Kartik Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Vikas Kumar Sharma, Advocate Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab Mr. Naveen Kumar Mehra, Advocate Mr. P.S. Mann, Advocate for the com ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
Through the instant petition file agarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for patory bail in case FIR No.87 dated 5(2), 117(2), 126(2), 303(2) and 3 3 at Police Station Sadar Hoshiarpur, Vide order dated 01.07.2025 passed on interim bail and was directed to jo Learned State counsel hasl filed sta not specifically mentioned in this repo JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-33631-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.02.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA
ocate for the petitioner vocate for complainant ed under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’), the petitioner dated 17.05.2025 registered under and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya arpur, District Hoshiarpur. passed by this Court, the petitioner to join investigation. led status report dated 17.01.2026, is report that the petitioner has joined M) 2026 oner
dent
the ioner nder yaya ioner , ined AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-33631- investigation or n Singh submits tha is not required for 4. In vi investigation and g required. As such, case for release of petition is allowed petitioner is made Section 482(2) of 5. Since if any, is rendered 11.02.2026 Amit Sharma


-2025 (O&M) 2 n or not but learned State counsel on its that the petitioner has joined invest ed for custodial interrogation. In view of the fact that the petiti n and given the nature of allegations, h s such, without commenting on merits ease of petitioner on anticipatory bail llowed and the order dated 01.07.202 made absolute, subject to complianc (2) of BNSS. Since the main petition has been disp dered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes 
 

sel on instructions from SI Satnam investigation on 26.12.2025 and she petitioner has already joined the ions, her pre-trial incarceration is not merits of case, it is observed that a y bail is made out. Accordingly, the 2025 granting interim bail to the pliance of conditions laid down in en disposed of, pending application, (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
tnam he the s not hat a , the o the n in tion, AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.