Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3445 (MAD)

M.Mani v. The Sub Registrar

WP/59/2023 · 2026-04-01

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 59 of 2023 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 59 of 2023 M.Mani S/o. M.Maree, No. 170, E.T. Block, Oorgum Post, K.G.F. Karnataka State, Pin Code 563 120. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Sub Registrar, Sunguvarchathiram Sub Registrar Office, Sunguvarchathiram , Kancheepuram District. 2. Smt. Shanthi D/o. Kanchana, No. 279 Valluvar Street, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Consitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to record the objections of the petitioner in the Index maintained in S.Nos. 104/5 - 0.41 Cents, 105/4- 0.64 cents, 107/7 - 0.10 cents, 216/5- 0.58 cents, 217/2- 0.50 cents , 251/ 4 - 0.22 cents, 268/1 -0.11 cents situated at Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 59 of 2023 __________ Page2 of 5 For Petitioner: Ms.R.Arthi For Mr.P.Krishnan For Respondents: Mr.P.Harish (R1) Government Advocate No appearance (R2) ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to record the objections of the petitioner in the Index maintained in S.Nos. 104/5 - 0.41 Cents, 105/4- 0.64 cents, 107/7 - 0.10 cents, 216/5- 0.58 cents, 217/2- 0.50 cents , 251/ 4 - 0.22 cents, 268/1 -0.11 cents situated at Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that since the 2nd respondent is attempting to encumber the petitioner’s property he submitted objections before the 1st respondent on 22.10.2020 and 05.12.2022 But the 1st respondent has not recorded the same in the index maintained in the aforesaid Survey Numbers till date. Further, he would submit that if the 1st respondent failed to make entry, his rights will be affected and the 3rd party interest will be created. He therefore filed this Writ Petition seeking for the aforesaid relief. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 59 of 2023 __________ Page3 of 5 3.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that if the petitioner files his objections in the form of affidavit, along with necessary charges, the 1st respondent will conduct enquiry and act in accordance with law. 4. Heard both sides. Perused the records. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the either side, this Court directs the petitioner to submit his objections in the form of affidavit before the 1st respondent along with necessary charges, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same , the 1st respondent is directed to conduct enquiry and act in accordance with law. 6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 01-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No arr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 59 of 2023 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The Sub Registrar Sunguvarchathiram sub Registrar office, Sunguvarchathiram , Kancheepuram district 2. Smt. Shanthi D/o. Kanchana, No. 279 Valluvar Street, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram district https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 59 of 2023 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. arr WP No. 59 of 2023 01-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 59 of 2023 __________ Page6 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis