HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9753 of 2023 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Instant writ petition has been listed under the heading of "Likely to be Infructuous" cases. 2. However, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to point out the survival of the instant writ petition. Therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. It is clarified that if the cause of action still survives to maintain the instant writ petition, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application within limitation against the order of the date. September 8, 2026 VR Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madhusudan Dikshit Counsel for Respondent(s) : Karshit Nigam, Ruduvant Pratap Singh (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Ram Naresh .....Petitioner(s) Sandeep Kumar .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad