Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3427 (ALL)

NATHIRAM RANA v. SMT. SHALINI AGRAWAL AND ANOTHER

A227/11330/2023 · 2026-09-07

Dinesh Pathak

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11330 of 2023 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Instant writ petition has been listed under the heading of "Likely to be Infructuous" cases. 2. However, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to point out the survival of the instant writ petition. Therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. It is clarified that if the cause of action still survives to maintain the instant writ petition, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application within limitation against the order of the date. September 8, 2026 VR Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Bhushan, Rajeshwar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Chetan Chatterjee (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Nathiram Rana .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Shalini Agrawal And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad