HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5246 of 2023 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. It is argued by the Counsel for the opposite party no.2 that despite the interim order dated 27.01.2025, the amount of back wages have not been deposited. 3. Considering the abovesaid submission, the interim order dated 27.01.2025 is recalled. The petition is dismissed. 4. The opposite party no.2 would be at liberty to execute the award in accordance with law. 5. In case, such an application is filed for execution of the award, the same shall be decided within four weeks from the date of filing of the application and in accordance with law. September 3, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Kumar Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Additional Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Forest,Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Presiding Officer Labour Court U.P. Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench