Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3202 (BOM)

DR. OMPRAKASH LALBAJI KINGAONKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/1037/2023 · 2026-09-10

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - criappln1037.23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1037 OF 2023 Dr. Omprakash Lalbaji Kingaonkar ….Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another …..Respondents ….. Mr. Niranjan Pande, Advocate holding for Mr. D. R. Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. B. Jadhav, APP for the State. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026. PER COURT : 1. Learned Counsel for Applicant, on instructions, makes a statement that the charge has already been framed herein in this case and as such, he seeks leave to withdraw the application. He, however, seeks direction to Trial Court to expedite the trial. 2. Learned APP, on instructions from his counter part before the Trial Court, makes a statement that charge has been framed and in all 7 to 8 witnesses are to be examined in this case. According to him, reasonable period of one year would be required for conclusion of the trial. - 2 - criappln1037.23.odt 3. In view of the above, application stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and in any case, conclude the same within a period of one year from today. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) dyb