Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3103 (BOM)

KU. VAISHALI SUBHASH RAHANE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF FINANCE, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

WP/7450/2023 · 2026-09-07

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 2-wp7445-2023 with connected petitions IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 7445 OF 2023 (Gopal Vasantrao Patil Vs. The State Of Maharashtra and Ors.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7446 OF 2023 (Farhana Anjum Ashfaque Ali Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6553 OF 2023 (Shaikh Norullah Shaikh Azmatullah Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7447 OF 2023 (Sanjay Gajanan Rahate Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7450 OF 2023 (Vaishali Subhash Rahane and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. P.S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. N.R. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Sharma Rohit Mukesh, Advocate for respondent No.2 in Writ Petition No. 7446 of 2023. Mr. Anilkumar J. Thakkar, Advocate for respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No. 7446 of 2023. Adv. D.M. Kale for respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No. 7450 of 2023. Adv. N.S. Jadhao h/f S.S. Jachak for respondent No.2 in Writ Petition No. 6553 of 2023. Adv. N.S. Bhelkar for respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No. 6553 of 2023. Mr. M.I. Dhatrak for respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No. 7447 of 2023. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 7, 2026. 1. Heard. 2. It is the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the issue involved in the present petitions is squarely covered by the judgments of this Court in Writ Petition MPBalekar 2026:BHC-NAG:11793-DB (2) 2-wp7445-2023 with connected petitions No.669 of 2024 (Dr. Rajesh Dnyaneshwar Mirge and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) decided on 13.08.2025, and Writ Petition No.5 of 2022 (Nitin S/o Babarao Gohatre and Anr. Vs. The Education Officer (Secondary) and Ors.) decided on 12.08.2025. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents do not dispute the aforesaid legal position. In view thereof, the present petitions are allowed in terms of the aforesaid judgments. 4. The respondents shall comply with and abide by the aforesaid judgments passed by this Court. In view of the aforesaid settled legal position, all the writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) MPBalekar Signed by: Mr. Mrunal P. Balekar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 07/09/2026 18:11:05