RAMESH GOVINDRAO MALI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/850/2023 · 2026-09-04
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3087 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3087 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
850.23WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.850 OF 2023 RAMESH GOVINDRAO MALI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.P.S.Anerao APP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil Advocate for Respondent nos. 4 to 6 : Mr.M.L.Paithane h/f.Mr.M.A.Golegaonkar …
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 04.09.2026 P.C. : 1] The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that since concerned Police Inspector, namely, Ashok Ghorband is transferred from Nanded District, first two prayer has become infructuous. So far as third prayer is concerned, it is for taking action against the said Inspector about accumulation of disproportionate asset by him. For that purpose, the petitioner can approach Anti Corruption Bureau of the concerned District. 2026:BHC-AUG:41305-DB
850.23WP 2 2] In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands
disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Anti Corruption Bureau of the concerned District to initiate action against concerned Police Inspector.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC