IMRAN ABDUL TAMBOLI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/828/2023 · 2026-09-04
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3083 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3083 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
828.23WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.828 OF 2023 IMRAN ABDUL TAMBOLI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.Shaikh Mazhar A.Jahagirdar APP for Respondent-State : Mr.S.J.Salgare ...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 04.09.2026 P.C. : 1] Heard.
2] The Petition appears to be filed for challenging the notice dated 18.05.2023 issued by the Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar for calling certain documents from the petitioner pursuant to the complaint made by one Rajendra Punjaji Pagar. 3] The learned APP by pointing out the relevant provisions of Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code submits that the concerned Police Station was having every right to issue such notice when the complaint was received by them. 2026:BHC-AUG:41307-DB
828.23WP 2 4] In the notice itself, the reference of the complaint filed by Rajendra Punaji Pagar has come. The record shows that this Court was not at all inclined to issue notice in this matter pursuant to the prayer. However, thereafter the report of the Resource Personnel of this Court dated 03.09.2026 clearly indicates that Special Civil Suit No.18/2024 appears to be filed by the petitioner and his relatives against Ujwala Rajendra Pagar and Rajendra Punjaji Pagar. Under such circumstance, when the subject matter of the impugned notice is also subject matter of the suit, nothing will survive in this Petition. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands
disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC