Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 3066 (BOM)

MAHAVIR BHUJGONDA PATIL v. TATYASO SHANTGONDA PATIL AND ORS

IA/1372/2023 · 2026-09-04

Civil Appealbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22-IA-1372-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1372 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 32792 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1373 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 32792 OF 2022 Mahavir Bhujgonda Patil ...Applicant Versus Tatyaso Shantgonda Patil And Ors. ...Respondents __________________________________________________________ Mr. D. G. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Om Gurav i/b Sandeep Korgave, Advocate for the Respondent No. 18 to 20. __________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 4th September, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. D. G. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Om Gurav, learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 18 to 20. 2. By this Interim Application, the Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 15 days in filing the Second Appeal (ST) No. 32792 of 2022, against the Judgment and Decree dated Arjun 1 22-IA-1372-2023.doc 11.08.2022, passed by the District Judge-1, Sangli in Regular Civil Appeal No. 353 of 2016. 3. Mr. D. G. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states that the Applicant is in financial crisis and as such, was not in a position to avail legal assistance. He submits that the Applicant finally approached the Legal Aid Cell of this Court to provide him with legal assistance. 4. Mr. Om Gurav, learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 18 to 20, does not oppose the condonation of delay of 15 days in filing of Regular Civil Appeal No. 353 of 2016. 5. In view of the above, considering the statements made in the Application, more so in paragraph Nos. 7 and 8 and the fair stand taken by Mr. Om Gurav, learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 18 to 20, this Application is allowed. Consequently, the delay in filing of the Second Appeal (ST) No. 32792 of 2022 is condoned. 6. The Registry is directed to register the Second Appeal (ST) No. 32792 of 2022. Arjun 2 22-IA-1372-2023.doc 7. Interim Application No. 1372 of 2023 is allowed and disposed of. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun 3 ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Digitally signed by ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Date: 2026.09.05 11:05:16 +0530