GANGOTRI MAHILA BACHAT GAT, THR. PRESIDENT, HINGANGHAT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
WP/7788/2023 · 2026-09-03
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3058 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 3058 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 909wp7788.2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 7788 OF 2023 (Gangotri Mahila Bachat Gat Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders __________________________________________________________________________________________ Mr. S.W. Sambre, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.R. Paddatwar, Adv h/f Mr. D.M. Kale, Advocate for respondent no.2. Mr. S.M. Ukey, Addl. GP for respondent no. 1/State. Mr. R.S. Charpe, Advocate for respondent no. 3.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR & RAJNISH R. VYAS,JJ. DATE
: 03/09/2026
Heard.
2. The learned counsel for petitioner, at the outset, submits that the decision taken by the respondent authority on the ground that First Information Report (FIR) was pending against the petitioner no longer survives, as the competent Court has already quashed the FIR. He submits that in this situation, he may be permitted to participate in the next tender process.
3. Be that as it may, the petitioner has every right to participate in the tender process if he is otherwise qualified. In that view, he submits that his grievance, at this stage, stands redressed.
4. Since, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, the petition is disposed of, accordingly.
(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) Belkhede Signed by: Mr. R. S. Belkhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 03/09/2026 18:26:21